<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: iCANN's protection
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 09:06:59PM +0000, david@farrar.com wrote:
[...]
> I am not dismissing with it. I am not debating it because I don't
> disagree with it. It is a fact that the GAO has not agreed on this
> point. I have never in fact even stated that I agree with Michael's
> position or paper. I just took issue with the suggestion that because
> it was written by Michael and some people found it difficult to
> understand that it should be given little credence.
If that had been what I said, I would agree with you. However, that is
not what I said.
[...]
> I hadn't really seen anyone treating it as gospel. I thought it was fairly
> obvious it is merely an opinion.
I do see people treating it very close to gospel, and I think that there
are a number of people who simply were not aware that it is merely an
opinion.
--
Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|