<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: iCANN's protection
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 04:16:47PM -0700, Roeland Meyer wrote:
> > From: Kent Crispin [mailto:kent@songbird.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 3:46 PM
>
> > > In fact, other mechanisms for controlling ICANN should be sought,
> > > and this search should also concern the supporting organizations'
> > > possibilities to control ICANN's activities.
> >
> > The other mechanisms are anti-trust authorities. This is what they do
> > for a living, you know.
>
> The fallacy here is assuming that ICANN falls under those regulations. As a
> USG contractor, it doesn't.
No fallacy at all. ICANN is not supposed to stay a USG contractor for
ever. If it does, all this is moot -- it has direct oversight from the
USG.
--
Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|