RE: [ga] Verisign Contract/policy

["Gene Marsh" <marshm@anycast.net>]

Sotiris,

I think Chuck's point is that there are factual issues (on both sides) that
need serious discussion, and that the "emotional reactions" only cloud that
discussion.  Perhaps some clarity would do us all some good.

Gene Marsh

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of Sotiris
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 12:24 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: 'Eric Dierker'; ga@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [ga] Verisign Contract/policy


"Gomes, Chuck" wrote:

> In my opinion, this is the kind of emotional reaction that limits the GA's
> credibility and therefore the willingness of others to take it seriously.

In other words, Mr. Gomes, although the Bylaws stipulate that the GA (like
the
AtLarge) has a specific role and function in ICANN, you and others are using
this "emotional reaction" excuse as a justification for acting against the
very
Bylaws of the Organization.  Why am I not surprised.  I suppose nobody ever
gets emotional over there at Verisign, huh?  especially when the stakes are
so
high?  With statements like this, it's pretty hard to take you seriously.

Sincerely,

Sotiris Sotiropoulos

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html