<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: [ga-review] Proposal to Merge the Business andIntellectual Property Constituency
Jefsey that was singularly well put.
Sotiris Sotiropoulos
Jefsey Morfin wrote:
> Dear DPF,
> it only shows the BC is not fulfilling its mission. Not that it has no mission.
> As an SME and a sall TM owner I don't see my interests represented by
> anyt of them two. You may rememebr that Philip Shepard publicly asked
> me on this list broadcasting a mail he has sent me privafely. This makes
> two responses: I did not have even an ACK.
> My position is simple: BC and IP should at least be be populated by 50%
> real people; true TM owners and true business owner/CEOs. Not by
> lawyers and employees.
> Jefsey
> .
>
> On 23:44 08/06/01, DPF said:
> >On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 11:41:49 -0400, you wrote:
> >
> > >The history of the DNSO is replete with joint communiqués issued by the
> > >Business and Intellectual Property Constituency:
> > >
> > >1. BC-IPC Safeguards Precis (Sept.2000)
> > >2. Minimum safeguards for the introduction of new TLDs - a joint statement
> > >from the Business and Intellectual Property Constituencies (Sept. 2000)
> > >
> > >The Business Constituency website routinely posts remarks from the
> > >Intellectual Property Constituency such as, "IP Constituency Statement on
> > >Proposed ICANN/VeriSign Agreement".
> > >
> > >It is clear to even the most casual observer that the affinity between these
> > >two groups is such that we are essentially looking at two sides of the same
> > >coin. A merger of these two constituencies would seem to be indicated.
> >
> >I must admit I can see almost no difference between them. I was
> >surprised to see on the WIPO site a submission from one of the BC reps
> >on the Names Council in his role as Chair of the European Trademark
> >Association (or similar).
> >
> >DPF
> >--
> >david@farrar.com
> >ICQ 29964527
> >--
> >This message was passed to you via the ga-review@dnso.org list.
> >Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> >("unsubscribe ga-review" in the body of the message).
> >Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|