Re: [ga] Re: [ga-review] Proposal to Merge the Business andIntellectual Property Constituency

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Sotiris, Jefsey and all assembly members,

  I though so as well pretty much.  However I have only one point of
possible disagreement or maybe misunderstanding.  Employees are
stakeholders too.  Their input is very important.  So if you are indicating,
Jefsey, which I don't believe you are but I am not sure, that any
constituency should not have employees as members would not be
a wise thing to require or otherwise hold out as unwanted or not
desired....

Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:

> Jefsey that was singularly well put.
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>
> Jefsey Morfin wrote:
>
> > Dear DPF,
> > it only shows the BC is not fulfilling its mission. Not that it has no mission.
> > As an SME and a sall TM owner I don't see my interests represented by
> > anyt of them two. You may rememebr that Philip Shepard publicly asked
> > me on this list broadcasting a mail he has sent me privafely. This makes
> > two responses: I did not have even an ACK.
> > My position is simple: BC and IP should at least be be populated by 50%
> > real people; true TM owners and true business owner/CEOs. Not by
> > lawyers and employees.
> > Jefsey
> > .
> >
> > On 23:44 08/06/01, DPF said:
> > >On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 11:41:49 -0400, you wrote:
> > >
> > > >The history of the DNSO is replete with joint communiqués issued by the
> > > >Business and Intellectual Property Constituency:
> > > >
> > > >1. BC-IPC Safeguards Precis (Sept.2000)
> > > >2. Minimum safeguards for the introduction of new TLDs - a joint statement
> > > >from the Business and Intellectual Property Constituencies (Sept. 2000)
> > > >
> > > >The Business Constituency website routinely posts remarks from the
> > > >Intellectual Property Constituency such as, "IP Constituency Statement on
> > > >Proposed ICANN/VeriSign Agreement".
> > > >
> > > >It is clear to even the most casual observer that the affinity between these
> > > >two groups is such that we are essentially looking at two sides of the same
> > > >coin.  A merger of these two constituencies would seem to be indicated.
> > >
> > >I must admit I can see almost no difference between them.  I was
> > >surprised to see on the WIPO site a submission from one of the BC reps
> > >on the Names Council in his role as Chair of the European Trademark
> > >Association (or similar).
> > >
> > >DPF
> > >--
> > >david@farrar.com
> > >ICQ 29964527
> > >--
> > >This message was passed to you via the ga-review@dnso.org list.
> > >Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > >("unsubscribe ga-review" in the body of the message).
> > >Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html