Re: [ga] bringing the rules into the 21st century

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

WXW, Eric and all assembly members,

  Despite WXW's questionable statements to the contrary and a review
of the ga-rules sublist archives it is clear and without question that the
current DNSO ga rules need to be changed or eliminated all together.
Therefore I support a need now for a motion to be proposed.  I hope
the Eric will draft such a motion and present it as such to the DNSO
GA so that the GA members can review and vote upon it and
some other work that the DNSO needs to get accomplished can
move forward.

  It is also clear after reading the archives or the ga-rules sub-list that

the so called "Buddy System" as proposed by Joanna Lane, has support
as an voluntary program to be considered for a motion on that basis.
Again I hope that Eric and Joanna can together possibly draft a separate
motion to present to the DNSO GA assembly members so that some
progress can be accomplished on this idea.  I hope it will be draft as
an up or down vote draft.

  In closing I would like to propose that we are all seeing here and on
some
of the DNSO sub lists some good ideas being brought forward that deserve
serious consideration and offer an opportunity for the DNSO GA to provide
for the GA members some viable participation that can result in progress
in addressing serious issues.  Of course, like WXW here (See below),
we have some GA members that seemingly are more interested in
negating any potential progress and value to the DNSO GA even
before the GA members that are not on any of the sub-lists have
a chance to review and possibly entertain a motion embodying these
discussions on these ideas from the sub-list I hope that the DNSO
GA members will not allow for this sort of negation influence your
own thinking processes and decisions....

William X. Walsh wrote:

> Hello Eric,
>
> Saturday, June 23, 2001, 9:38:58 PM, Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> > GA-Rules sublists had my proposal several days ago and there has been
> > not direct opposition to it.
>
> There has been no support for it, either.  Your proposal has no merit.
> The rules do not need to be modified as you say.  Your assumption that
> they do is faulty.
>
> Bottom line, there has not been sufficient support for your proposal
> to warrant it being taken into consideration as a motion for the GA.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> Userfriendly.com Domains
> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
> DNS Services from $1.65/mo
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html