Re: [ga] Motion to Condemn the Propsed "theft" of the .BIZ tld by ICANN

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Dear Sandy,
there are three different things here.
1) a consensus about the need of a global name space policy to be draft. I 
suppose you do not agree that the "historic" iCANN policy on the matter is 
to be drafter by Lynn alone. The consensus is not on the policy but on the 
need to discuss it. At least I hope so since for three months every thing 
is made to impeach that?

2) a vote of the Members of the DNSO about a political move. There is no 
consensus reasearch. This is only a motion to be voted. Like we voted last 
year against the Cybersquatters? How can you oppose a vote?

3) the whole issue rises technical and political problems wich are of 
the  DNSO competence. I would, by  example, be quite interested in the 
IP/root related obligations to ISPs or how DNS views could be used to 
partly address the problem. Most of all the status of our .biz fellow DN 
holders deprived from their DNs without anyone suggesting any solution: 
just a prelude to .org.
Jefsey


On 15:00 24/06/01, Sandy Harris said:
>Jeff Williams wrote:
>
> > William X. Walsh wrote:
>
> > > Motions should be embodiments of things on which the GA has either
> > > reached, or is close to reaching, consensus on.
>
>Correct.
>
> > A consensus is measured by a VOTE.
>
>Nonsense. Voting may sometimes be a useful tool for testing whether
>a consensus exists. If it is clear, as it is here on this issue, that
>no consensus exists, then a vote is pointless.
>
> > Hence it is a good idea to put up a motion on this issue now.
>
>No, it isn't.
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html