Re: [ga] bringing the rules into the 21st century

["Earl Heather" <earl@pheather.com>]

Fine.

If you're that confident that the proposal has no merit, let's take it to a 
vote, and we'll see who wins.

Defeating a motion seems a valid reason for encouraging the vote so I 
fail to understand your desire to AVOID the vote.

Earl

> Hello Eric,
> 
> Saturday, June 23, 2001, 9:38:58 PM, Eric Dierker wrote:
> 
> > GA-Rules sublists had my proposal several days ago and there has been
> > not direct opposition to it.
> 
> There has been no support for it, either.  Your proposal has no merit.
> The rules do not need to be modified as you say.  Your assumption that
> they do is faulty.
> 
> Bottom line, there has not been sufficient support for your proposal
> to warrant it being taken into consideration as a motion for the GA.
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> Userfriendly.com Domains
> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
> DNS Services from $1.65/mo
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
> 
> 


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html