<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Domain names as observed (was Tucows Response to Cochet tiTransfer Letter)
- To: <ga@dnso.org>
- Subject: RE: [ga] Domain names as observed (was Tucows Response to Cochet tiTransfer Letter)
- From: "Dassa" <dassa@dhs.org>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 17:58:36 +1000
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <3B63BA0D.79DEEF45@hi-tek.com>
- Reply-To: <dassa@dhs.org>
- Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org
|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: Eric Dierker [mailto:eric@hi-tek.com]
|> Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 5:24 PM
|> To: dassa@dhs.org
|> Cc: ga@dnso.org
|> Subject: Re: [ga] Domain names as observed (was Tucows Response to
|> Cochet tiTransfer Letter)
|>
|>
|> Dassa,
|>
|> This is a fundamental, flaw, we the GA get to declare what it
|> is, the courts only enforce it. It is a property right and make no
mistake about it!
|>
|> Eric
I'm afraid Eric you are assuming too much power for the GA. The GA can not
declare what a domain is or what rights are assigned to one.
For you to declare domain names have property rights does not make it true.
Especially where there is substantial evidence and precedents to indicate
otherwise. We might wish it was otherwise but that doesn't make it a fact.
Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|