Re: [ga] Best Practices/ who objects?

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Dear Contributors both silent and loud,

Oh my,  this post has been pointed out as highly critical of our leader.
It was meant to give him the opportunity to be critical of our system and
suggest remedies.  I feel quite confident that he would exercise his power
to implement the rules swiftly and with fairness, but that some other
reason exists that he cannot.  I also understand that the authors are not
fully satisfied with the works and would rather it be perfected prior to
full usage.  That is why I improperly used the latin defacto.  I find no
reason why Danny cannot simply order that they be implemented.  If Swensson
can unilaterally suspend me from the list based upon rules not voted upon
certainly Danny can invoke these best practices in the same manner.  Lets
just call it marshall law;-}

Eric

Eric Dierker wrote:

> And Mr. Younger please explain why these have not been implemented.  No
> I mean really why we have not adopted them defacto.  If you answer with
> garbage you shall reap what you sow.
>
> The URLs for Best Practices: DNSO Citation:
> http://www.dnso.org/dnso/gaindex.html
> (Under "Other Information Documents"; "August 2001:
> Proposal for Best Practices for the DNSO GA")
> Part I:
> http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20010813.GA-BestPractices.html
> Part II:
> http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20010813.GA-BP-flowchart.pdf
> (Access to the .pdf file requires installing the Adobe Acrobat
> Reader, which is available for free down load at
> http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html.)
>
> --
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html