Re: [ga] Best Practices/ who objects?

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Mr. Walsh,

Most of the time you expound legal principals which are erroneous at best in that
you have no legal or legal scholarly training and jump to ridiculous conclusions.
Now you jump to research conclusions which reveal a whole new level of ignorance.
The research you do not know and I have forgotten could fill a library.

Show me one sentence in one place where one matter was voted upon that demands
suspension.  Just one smart man.  If you can I shall self suspend for 48 hours.
You may want to callaborate with Mr Svensson.  the offer remains open for 24
hours.  Do not promote vagueness for a taking of a right should be very specific.

Eric

William X Walsh wrote:

> Saturday, Saturday, August 25, 2001, 12:49:31 PM, William X Walsh wrote:
>
> > Saturday, Saturday, August 25, 2001, 6:50:24 AM, Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> >> reason why Danny cannot simply order that they be implemented.  If Swensson
> >> can unilaterally suspend me from the list based upon rules not voted upon
>
> > The list rules were voted on.
>
> Since you can't seem to do your own research before jumping to
> conclusion, let me point out the relevant vote for you:
>
> http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/2000.GA-ga-roo-vote.html
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> Userfriendly.com Domains
> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
> DNS Services from $1.65/mo
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html