Re: The ccTLD position (was Re: [ga] taking positions on country specific legislation

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Gentle Folks,

You are all mailed directly here because I want your consensus!!

This is very important to me and our many dotcommoners.  We must stand together
that there are no deletions to seats to the at large based upon creation of any
individuals constituency or any new ccTLD constituencies/SOs. If any one
included herein determines that they can negotiate this back door for votes of
what ever please speak your piece.

Please join with me on a consensus to this matter.

Bless all who in engage in dialogue.
Eric

Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter Dengate-Thrush" <barrister@chambers.gen.nz> wrote:
> <snip>
> > The fact that there is a formidable challenge to the At Large Movement
> > having 9 seats is not of the ccTLDs making.
>
> True enough.
>
> > In the absence of creating new seats, we accept that our ccSO proposal
> will
> > require a re-allocation of existing seats. There are a large number of
> > factors which will go into the Board's re-evaluation of the balance of
> > representation in ICANN.
> >
> > Once there is acceptance of the ccSO in principle, we expect to take part
> > with other stakeholders in discussions about that balance. That's a debate
> > we look forward to.
>
> This almost sounds encouraging.
>
> >In the meantime, lets stick to the facts.
>
> I'm all for that.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html