<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re[3]: [ga] Registrars Draft: Transfers
I also forgot to mention, that under the UDRP, the domain registrant
is required to submit to the jurisdiction of the registrar in any
court case, which lets the complainant select the jurisdiction as
either that of the registrant OR that of the registrar. You could be
subject to a default judgement if you fail to make an appearance in
that foreign court.
Wednesday, Wednesday, September 26, 2001, 6:01:07 PM, William X Walsh wrote:
> Wednesday, Wednesday, September 26, 2001, 8:48:46 PM, Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:
>> Thankfully, my domain registrar of choice is an enlightened organzation.
>> Here's a couple points from their website (http://www.gandi.net/whowe.html.en):
>> *************
>> Why choose Gandi?
>> -you really are owner of your domain, as explained on point 1 of our contract,
> Which is really nothing but symbolic, since that "ownership" is still
> subject to the same conditions that every registrar is required to
> impose on registrants.
>> -you can at any time freely transfer your domain name to another Registrar, without
>> fee nor locking from our part.
> Something that most registrars practice as well, with a few notable
> exceptions, such as NSI, Register.com, Registrars.com, and a handful
> of others who think Lock-In is a good thing. But by and large, most
> registrars do no encumber outbound transfers in any way.
--
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
DNS Services from $1.65/mo
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|