Re: [ga] The "Official" ALSC Report is Posted

[k@widgital.com (Kristy McKee)]

><snip>
>The recommendations in this report should not be adopted by the Board 
>without serious improvement.
>
>The proposals on how to cast the future distribution of Board seats in 
>stone are beyond the scope of the Committee's study mandate and a 
>permanent minority position on the Board as envisaged for ICANN's members 
>is not exactly the place to be when you want to have input in DNS policy.
>
>My conclusion, now more than ever, is that the Individual Domain Name 
>Holders must get their representation in the DNSO, in balance with the 
>registration provider industry.
>
>--Joop

Additionally, Joop, more Partnerships and Corporations should become 
involved in the BC & ISPCP to balance out the Bandwidth/Telephone Company 
strongholds.

~k

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html