RE: [ga] Review Task Force Final Report

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>]

Danny,

I think you are exactly right on this.  This recommendation by the Review TF
is a way of avoiding the need to get a full community consensus (in other
words, skirting around the real issues).  Too many people want something
fast and easy and are not willing to expend the effort and time to do what
is necessary to show true consensus.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DannyYounger@cs.com [mailto:DannyYounger@cs.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 12:03 PM
> To: ga@dnso.org
> Subject: [ga] Review Task Force Final Report
> 
> 
> The Final Report of the NC review Task Force has been released:  
> http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc06/doc00013.doc
> 
> As expected, the views of the General Assembly and the 
> Non-Commercials were 
> cited, and then disregarded.  
> 
> One of the most damaging recommendations:  
> 
> "A 2/3 vote of the NC should be taken as meaning consensus on 
> the issue and 
> the by-laws should be changed to remove the obligation on the NC to 
> "determine community consensus"  with the implication it is 
> an external 
> factor."
> 
> The report is a mockery of the Review process, but read it 
> yourself and draw 
> your own conclusions.
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html