<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] The "mushroom treatment"....
- To: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
- Subject: Re: [ga] The "mushroom treatment"....
- From: Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 21:55:13 -0800
- CC: Jim Fleming <jfleming@anet.com>, ga@dnso.org, wbailey@ntia.doc.gov, jcrapa@ntia.doc.gov, ehawkins@ntia.doc.gov, dhurley@ntia.doc.gov, smadden@ntia.doc.gov, hshaw@ntia.doc.gov, nvictory@ntia.doc.gov, mwallach@ntia.doc.gov, swilliams@ntia.doc.gov, lynn@icann.org
- Organization: Hi-Tek.com.vn
- References: <3BFB1A9F.5C4CCC67@hi-tek.com> <003301c17241$b8e76e20$3200a8c0@pamela> <3BFB2EA7.E21E486C@hi-tek.com> <3BFB5498.5BAB952C@ix.netcom.com>
- Reply-To: eric@GodBless.biz
- Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org
Your total ignorance is well placed.
If there were any political gain in worrying about your conversion I would work it. but alas it is a wasted effort as you
bring me no constituency.
If I am wron I beg your forgiveness. And that of your constituency.
Peace for you in this time of Ramadan!
Eric
Jeff Williams wrote:
> Eric and all assembly members,
>
> Perhaps taking your own advice of not attacking the messenger
> but rather the message is in order. From the book of judges,
> I don't remember the exact chapter # or verse # off hand:
> "Judge not yet ye be judged sayith the lord"...
>
> Although your listed attributes are interesting, I am sure I don't believe it
> in it's entirety. "Green Paper indeed"! You need to do much more
> studying Eric. Theologists are a dime a dozen. Not all that impressive.
> I did not see you listed in the ASA either.
>
> Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> > Funny your reference to the time period spent by myself;
> >
> > For a man who has obviously not obtained degrees in matters such as
> > Philosophy and Law with equal time spent studying business and
> > psychology, who has no marketing education and has no license in
> > theology you presume much by criticizing my perspective on corporate
> > constitutional and social matters. I suggest that my 3,000 hours plus
> > of studying your internet gives me more than license to invade your
> > culture. Especially since a good 100 of it has been spent
> > researching your posts and the related subject matter.
> >
> > Please do not mistake my humbleness for anything less than politeness.
> > Naperville deserves nothing less, as my mother was born and raised there
> > I understand their moral standards to be far above your technical ones.
> >
> > Do not assume to battle me in matters of policy and I will let your
> > technical matters go as they deserve.
> >
> > I would never talk to a Newbie this way but you show here why your ilk
> > is no match for the NC or BS.
> >
> > Attack the message not the messenger. It makes you look bad otherwise.
> >
> > I make this contribution to the entire group you ccd. Because it is
> > important that while you all may be higher genius than folks like I, you
> > have not the genius in the human condition and fall well short of your
> > mandate to take care of those of us less fortunate. You have a
> > responsibility not to act sanctimonious. You have an obligation to act
> > on our behalf and that requires consultation with those of us who know
> > what that behalf is and is not. How dare any and all of you act without
> > regard to how and what we need (the user wants and needs), you make
> > science
> > an evil art to be endowed strictly to those who control it.
> >
> > {kind of harsh and a rant but take it easy and consider my quarter toned
> > down, and thank all of you for your wonderful contributions}
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Eric
> >
> > Jim Fleming wrote:
> >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Eric Dierker" <eric@hi-tek.com>
> > > To: <ga@dnso.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:08 PM
> > > Subject: [ga] Motion and request for amendment
> > >
> > > > I Eric Dierker, being a member of the GA of ICANN, hereby make motion
> > > > that the GA agree, reach consensus and evidence by a vote, formal or
> > > > otherwise, that the BC (business constituency within the DNSO of ICANN)
> > > > is currently acting in direct contravention of the Green Papers the
> > > > White Papers, all and amended contracts with the DoC (department of
> > > > commerce of the US gov).....
> > >
> > > In my opinion, you might want to study the long history that lead up
> > > to the founding of ICANN. You stated at the ICANN meeting that you
> > > became an Internet user 18 months ago. That may make it hard to emcompass
> > > the past 7 years of history and the years before 1995, where the small
> > > circle of Jon Postel's cronies systematically controlled the allocation of
> > > basic Internet resources through their combined government and educational
> > > institution network, aided by a small group of corporate supporters who
> > > realized they could make a lot of money, for doing very little, by supporting
> > > that regime. That worked as long as the general public was given the
> > > "mushroom treatment" (i.e. kept in the dark and fed manure).
> > >
> > > Here is a sample....
> > > http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/internet/11/20/interview.lynn.idg/index.html
> > > "...ICANN's Lynn: No new domains anytime soon..."
> > > ....
> > > Q: If there are no technical impediments to adding top-level domains, would that essentially obligate you to do so?
> > > A: No. We do have other responsibilities in creating a level playing field and a fair place for competition.
> > > -----------------
> > >
> > > It all boils down to fairness.
> > > Which list do you think is more fair ?
> > > The "toy" IPv4 Internet Early Experimentation Allocations ?
> > > http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
> > > or
> > > The Proof-of-Concept IPv8 Allocations ?
> > > http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
> > >
> > > People are now prepared to route around ICANN. Thanks to Microsoft,
> > > all of the technology is in people's hands (via Windows XP) to break
> > > free from the shackles of the Postel regime and to build a larger, more
> > > open, and more free Internet, that all of the world's people can be proud of,
> > > not just the small circle of insiders who have conspired for years to
> > > control the allocation of Internet resources for their own financial gain.
> > >
> > > Jim Fleming
> > > http://www.DOT-BIZ.com
> > > http://www.in-addr.info
> > > 3:219 INFO
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> Contact Number: 972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|