Re: [ALSC-Forum] Re: [ga] DNSO Constituency Structure

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

I agree with Jeff's point of view here but I wonder if we cannot reach some
middle ground for consensus.

I am an absolutist when it comes to contractual and promises, but should not
those of us working for the little guy try to find some compromise of consensus
area that works?

When does a side have no right or rite to demand a change toward a better
position?

Answers anyone?

Eric

Jeff William's wrote:

> Chuck and all assembly members, stakeholders or interested parties,
>
> Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: DPF [mailto:david@farrar.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 4:56 AM
> > > To: Gomes, Chuck
> > > Cc: [ga]
> > > Subject: Re: [ga] DNSO Constituency Structure
> > >
> > >
> > (Text deleted)
> > >
> > > What is wrong with doing what basically happened to the other seven
> > > constituencies.  Approve the concept in principle and then you will
> > > find members and structure will come easily.  Also one could assert
> > > that as a constituency can change its charter at will from that
> > > initially approved why worry about what is there at the moment of
> > > application as it could change the next day?
> > >
> > Personally I would find nothing wrong with that approach; I just think that
> > it is extremely unlikely to happen.  The choices then are to sit around and
> > wait and complain that nothing happens or do something that might increase
> > the chances significantly.  A third alternative is to support the ALSC
> > recommendations for an At-Large SO that could possibly meet many of the
> > needs that an individuals' constituency might meet.
>
>   The problem with your third alternative is that the ALSC study did not
> and still does not meet the polled consensus or the stakeholders
> and interested parties.  Ergo Chuck, it cannot meet any of the
> needs of the stakeholders adequately as it leaves out the vast
> majority or stakeholders in their "Final Report"...
>
> >
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> > (Text deleted)
> > >
> > > DPF
> > > --
> > > david@farrar.com
> > > ICQ 29964527
> > >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html