[ga] "Terms of Reference" or "Task Force Agenda" ??

["Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>]

On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 02:09:42 EST, Danny Younger wrote:
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-transfer/Arc00/msg00078.html

> Perhaps someone can explain to me why we are dancing around the issue.
> The clear objective of this Task Force is to establish a "consensus policy",
> and that is exactly what the terms of reference should be stipulating.

On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 07:11:36 -0500, Ken Stubbs wrote:
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-transfer/Arc00/msg00081.html

> if we could incorporate into the document language  insuring that the new
> mgt. company will not impose any onerous accreditation fees or "new
> financial barriers"  and will honor the ICANN accredited status of the
> existing registrars this would be a very good start.

My apologies to Philip Sheppard for asking him to provide URL links
to the Terms of Reference (ToR) for each of the Task Forces.  I had
assumed that, as in normal political discourse, the "terms" had been
specified by the referring body (in this case the Names Council).

How silly of me  !!  That's not the idea at all.

The truth is that the Names Council stacks the Task Forces who
then write the Terms of Reference to suit themselves.

Duh !!

However, to avoid confusion could I ask that the wording "Terms of
Reference" be changed to "Task Force Agenda" or something similar.

Regards
Patrick Corliss








--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html