Re: [ga] Top Three Issues

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 01:03 3/12/01 -0500, L Gallegos wrote:


>On 3 Dec 2001, at 17:37, Peter Dengate Thrush wrote:
>
> > If the USG ever feels that the ICANN which eventually presents itself does
> > not meet the terms of the White Paper, or any new conditions mandated by
> > the USG before transfer of technical management of the Legacy Root's names
> > and numbers, it will seek to have ICANN make any necessary changes, or
> > decline to transfer.
>
>And there's the real issue, IMO.  The USG DoC has repeatedly
>abrogated its responsibilties in oversight of ICANN.

Leah,

Could this be because from their p.o.v. ICANN is doing just fine?
Could it be that the White Paper is now considered as "something from the 
Clinton administration" and best buried?

--Joop

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html