RE: Re[2]: [ga] eresolution realizes fairness doesn't pay under udrp

[Joseph <fhlee@tm.net.my>]

WXW:
>>> He won't have need of those services.  There won't be a trial in his
case.
*** (Seriously Off Topic) Which to me, is an infrigement of Human Rights.
Something which US has hold very strongly for.

Even the Yugoslavian guy (accused of genocide) has (is having) a trial ...
Why not Osama?  One should practise what one preaches.  To sentence someone
without a proper trial is pure infringement of human rights.  Irregardless
of one's action.


regards,
- Joseph LEE (Fook Heng)
========================

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of William X
Walsh
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:41 AM
To: William S. Lovell
Cc: ga@dnso.org
Subject: Re[2]: [ga] eresolution realizes fairness doesn't pay under
udrp


Wednesday, Wednesday, December 05, 2001, 9:22:32 AM, William S. Lovell
wrote:

> If asked, I would defend Osama bin Laden, since there would be
> all the protections of the Federal Court system that I could use,
> and everyone has the right to those protections and an attorney
> who can use them.

He won't have need of those services.  There won't be a trial in his
case.

--
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--
Webcertificates.info
SSL Certificates for resellers from $49ea

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html