Re: [ga] eresolution realizes fairness doesn't pay under udrp

["Paul Cotton" <paulc@joinin.com>]

Hi John,

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D." <john@johnberryhill.com>
<snip>
And if the lawyer knows that NAF has a higher complainant win rate than
eRes,
that lawyer is "scrupulous" if she witholds that information from her
client?

It would be malpractie NOT to seek to obtain the most favorable outcome for
one's client.  Apparently, some former DRP's have no scruples when it comes
to ignoring one of a lawyer's primary ethical obligations.
<snip>
--

I understand your points entirely - the problem is that such discrepancy
exists between forums in the first place, not that lawyers may choose to
exploit that discrepancy (as their paying clients would expect).

Regards

Paul Cotton

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html