Re: [ga] Auerbach vs. ICANN update

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

First off, a lawsuit is frivilous if the plaintiff has no case.

A defense is frivolous, if it is asserted with no basis in fact.

Karl's lawsuit is in no way frivilous however ICANN has no defense based in 
fact.

Would anyone here work for a company as a director without having access, 
full and complete without restriction, to finances?  Especially when they 
are not filing timely.

If ICANN has major tax or liability problems Karl is at least somewhat 
responsible - Therefor he had to file the lawsuit, no choice, not moral, 
not legal and certainly not financially.

Sincerely,
Eric

> Ken Stubbs wrote:
>> 
>> hello sandy ..
>> 
>> many your inquiries can be answered by reading the
>> legal briefs prepared by both sides.
> 
> I see nothing in either brief that answers my question.
>  
>> > Can someone please tell me exactly what ICANN
>> > management are protecting here? What parts of
>> > ICANN financial records are confidential and
>> > why?
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html


http://www.Hi-Tek.com
Reality in a Digital World

The information transmitted in this e-mail is intended for the person or
entity to which it is addressed, and may contain confidential and/or
privileged material.  Any review, retransmission or other use of, or
taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited.  If
you receive this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete
this material from any system.  Thank you!


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html