Re: [ga] Auerbach vs. ICANN update
I am a lawyer, and represent no one in this case, so in that sense my comments are merely those of a buttinski. However, generally speaking, in the practice of law, it is common for people against whom some charge has been leveled to run around mending their fences. In the Enron case, indeed, some folks evidently headed right for their shredders with a bunch of incriminating documents, and are now charged with the Federal crime of obstructing justice. I don't know what's happening at ICANN, but as a rule, what is relevant is the state of affairs leading up to the filing of a suit, and what happens after that, such as the termination of Karl's tenure as Director, should have no effect on his case, although more road blocks could possibly be tried out. The discovery process, if enforced by the judge, should yield access to whatever Karl is after. (The foregoing is a general comment, and should not be interpreted as being legal advice to anyone.) Bill Lovell Joanna Lane wrote: DPEOJECBMOLLLJOFDNDPIEKLCEAA.jo-uk@rcn.com">GA list, it sound like the ICANN staff and their law firm are stalling as
|