ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Negative outreach norms, board claims regarding consensus in favor of "reform" efforts


TR;

If I were hired to do a negative outreach instructional program.  (i do not
sell products but concepts)
I would take your picture and make a poster and a web site.  And say this
is the picture of negative outreach.
Sorry sometimes even a mellow creature like me needs to flame.

TR, there is a song out there that says it is not what you say but what you
do.
Is there one thing that you in the GA have done - up the latter to the NC
and then to the BoD of ICANN that in the slightest way suggests that you
can reform from within?

I do not think so!  In fact the best that has been done is the Lynn
"proclamation of failure".  but that is cheap ass talk with no doing.  And
your baiting questions here are more verbal crap with no results.
Jamie is getting something done, hooray for him.

Oh by the way where are your dotDE supporters, they seem to have shrunk
after you enlisted them strictly for your election?

Call a spade a spade.

Eric


Thomas Roessler wrote:

> On 2002-05-08 20:21:55 -0400, Michael Froomkin wrote:
>
> >>Of these, the first option (a different private entity) seems to
> >>be the one least likely.
>
> >I wish I agreed, but I don't. The US is very sensitive to EU and
> >other concerns and wishes to have maximum distance from its
> >'failsafe' role in running the DNS.  It wants the private solution
> >very badly.
>
> Your argument doesn't justify the conclusion: All you say is that
> there will be continued private-sector control.  However, you fail
> to point out what incentive the players involved (which include the
> USG!) have to set up a DIFFERENT private-sector entity for
> exercising that control, when they can just as well reform the
> existing one.
>
> --
> Thomas Roessler                          http://log.does-not-exist.org/
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>