<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] NC BS
Philip Sheppard wrote:
> Joop, thank you for your comments. Are you saying that the majority of
> individuals currently wishing to be engaged in ICANN and outside of
> the constituency structure are not consumers but:
>
>
>
> "producers of content, directly related to their Domain" ...with a
> subsequent "highly personal interest in a NAME, an identifier of
> themselves or their on-line business".
>
>
>
> In other words such individuals are typically unincorporated
> businesses (profit or not for profit), sharing a lot of common
> interest with the business constituency or non-comms, but are today
> unable to join the BC or non-coms because they choose to trade as
> individuals rather than be incorporated as SMEs or organisations ?
>
>
>
> If yes this perspective, and therefore the way we incorporate these
> stakeholders, is important. What helps is to differentiate the
> interests of individuals as providers from individuals as users.
>
I believe the possibility of registering .pro and .name domains are
perfect examples of how individuals _are_ stakeholders in their own
right, irrespective of their activities (producers or users).
Sincerely,
Sotiris Sotiropoulos
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|