ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] WLS call follow-up


Gary,

I fail to see how you draw those conclusions from my post. I'm pretty
sure that I was quite explicit in commenting on the the market share
claims. nothing more.



Gary Osbourne wrote:
> 
> At 08:40 AM 22/05/02 -0400, Dan Steinberg wrote:
> >Interesting numbers.  But given that you figure the remains add up to
> >maybe 10% and the original claim worked out to 17.5% we are not talking
> >much of a difference. 10% -17/5% is not a big spread. The large numbers
> >are still the 40% which belongs to the Verisign registrar.  No matter
> >how it's sliced, Verisign  Registry can technically claim market share
> >support in the registrar business for their WLS proposal.
> 
> So, *because* ICANN has to date largely failed at
> fostering competition for Veri$ign, that is given
> as a rationale for why ICANN should OK a proposal
> that further lessens competition for Veri$ign? -g

-- 
Dan Steinberg

SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
35, du Ravin		phone: (613) 794-5356
Chelsea, Quebec		fax:   (819) 827-4398
J9B 1N1                 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>