<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Grace and Redemption
maybe instead of just talking about the issues , someone
should suggest a practical solution to the potential propblem being
discussed here..
ken stubbs
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] Grace and
Redemption
My point is that the registrant has to use the email address to
contact the system in order to verify the transaction (email
verification). Many registrants use their domain for email and some
even just for email, so that they do not have to continually change email
addresses if they change ISPs, etc. So, going to a neighbor to use
his email addy is not going to do anything. It won't compute.
That has been one of the bugaboos when people do change email addresses
due to ISP changes, especially when it is due to an ISP failure or other
emergency change. Suddenly one can't do anything about modifying
domain information and it all has to be done by phone. With Verisign
it is extremely painful to do anything via phone or fax. Other
registrars do not even make their phone numbers public - or at least easy
to find.
It is an issue whether some feel otherwise or
not.
The telephone or electric bill analogy is not a good one, IMO,
since most people would be able to deal with that simply - by using
another phone. Verification of an email address is not necessary,
nor is verification of the number from which you are
calling.
Leah
On 28 Jun 2002, at 13:54, Dan Steinberg
wrote:
> I have to agree. If your phone gets disconnected, it doesnt
matter if > its because you 'thought you had paid' but hadnt or if its
turly telco > error or lost cheque. You still have to go visit a
neighbour, or use a > cell phone or trundle down to find a pay phone
just to establish what > the problem is and see if you have to do
something (like pay). It's your > repsonisibility to find a way to do
this. > > William X Walsh wrote: > > > >
Friday, June 28, 2002, 1:31:08 AM, L. Gallegos wrote: > > >
> > Well, the board approved it, but I still have a question that no
one > > > seems to have addressed. > > > > >
If an expired domain is placed on registry hold and no longer
resolves, > > > and the contact email is based on that domain, how
will the registrant > > > be able to "undelete" it or move it to
another registrar to redeem it if > > > there can be no
contact? > > > > > It seems to me that there should be
some resolution to this question or > > > what good is the Grace
and Redemption perioid? The only other means > > > to
communicate in this scenario, would be by telephone. Some of the >
> > registrars do not even list their phone numbers on their websites
and > > > there would be little time to handle it via snail
mail. > > > > > Anyone have any comments? > >
> > Personal Responsibility. > > > > -- >
> Best regards, > > William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info> > >
-- > > Save Internet Radio! > > CARP will kill
Webcasting! > > http://www.saveinternetradio.org/ >
> > > -- > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list. > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe >
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message). > > Archives at
http://www.dnso.org/archives.html >
> -- > Dan Steinberg > > SYNTHESIS:Law &
Technology > 35, du Ravin phone: (613) 794-5356 > Chelsea, Quebec
fax: (819) 827-4398 > J9B
1N1
e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca > -- > This message was passed to
you via the ga-full@dnso.org
list. > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe >
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message). > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html >
>
-- This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list. Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to
unsubscribe ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message). Archives at
http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|