Re: [ga] Re: news from bucharest: at large exists again

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

I have not seen one reference to a benefit of being a member of the aloc.
I have not seen a published protocol or documentation of purpose.
This sure looks like the tail wagging the dog.
Eric

James Love wrote:

> Vittorio,
>
>      What difference does it make whether a group is accepted or rejected in
> this new Denise/Esther at-large "structure."?  What power does it have?
> What role does it have in allowing public to set the agenda?  Can it even
> elect its own leaders?  Who is the current leader of this, and how was that
> person choosen?
>
> Jamie
>
> Vittorio Bertola wrote:
> > On Sat, 29 Jun 2002 09:27:30 -0700, you wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I believe based upon experience and a long history this is naive.
> >
> >
> > I think we can have counter-proof of this: just let any organization you
> > trust (including Jefsey's ones) ask Denise Michel for inclusion in the ALOC,
> > and let's see what she answers.
>
> --
> ------
> James Love, Consumer Project on Technology
> http://www.cptech.org, mailto:love@cptech.org
> voice: 1.202.387.8030; mobile 1.202.361.3040
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html