Re: Fwd: [ga] Why so long

[Don Brown <donbrown_l@inetconcepts.net>]

It is precisely here:

">From a slightly different perspective, a party can currently obtain
service from several different sources (SnapNames, included) and there
is competition between them. If ICANN approves WLS, then there will be
only one source. So, in that scope your statement is true, since ICANN
would be getting in the way of free enterprise and not fostering
competition."

In this msg:

Received: from dnso.dnso.org [192.134.4.239] by inetconcepts.net with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-6.06) id AB41B61010A; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:56:49 -0500
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
        by dnso.dnso.org (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) id BAA08104;
        Fri, 12 Jul 2002 01:00:35 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from inetconcepts.net (mail.inetconcepts.net [64.90.56.8])
        by dnso.dnso.org (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA08100;
        Fri, 12 Jul 2002 01:00:33 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from db.inetconcepts.net [64.90.56.19] by inetconcepts.net with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-6.06) id AE99111A011C; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:02:49 -0500
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:01:28 -0500
From: Don Brown <donbrown_l@inetconcepts.net>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.60q) Business
Reply-To: Don Brown <donbrown_l@inetconcepts.net>
Organization: Internet Concepts, Inc.
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <87196366928.20020711180128@inetconcepts.net>
To: owner-ga@dnso.org, Bret Fausett <fausett@lextext.com>
CC: "John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D." <john@johnberryhill.com>, DNSO General Assembly <ga@dnso.org>
Subject: Re: [ga] Thoughts/question on the WLS
In-Reply-To: <B95341E1.F890%fausett@lextext.com>
References: <B95341E1.F890%fausett@lextext.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Declude-Sender: donbrown_l@inetconcepts.net [64.90.56.19]
X-Declude-Spoolname: D0e9911c.SMD
X-Note: Please send abuse reports to abuse@inetconcepts.net.
Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Declude-Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org [192.134.4.239]
X-Declude-Spoolname: D1b4110a.SMD
X-Note: This E-mail was sent from dnso.dnso.org. ([192.134.4.239]).
X-Note: Failed: None - Total Weight: 0.
X-Note: Checked for SPAM and Viruses by Internet Concepts - http://www.inetconcepts.net.
X-RCPT-TO: <donbrown_l@inetconcepts.net>
X-UIDL: 313641978
Status: U


Thursday, July 11, 2002, 11:15:33 PM, Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org> wrote:
TR> On 2002-07-11 21:09:30 -0500, Don Brown wrote:

>>I would like to know exactly why it is taking my posts almost an 
>>hour to be distributed to this list.

TR>  From the received headers, it looks like the message sat in the  
TR> mail queue on the DNSO server for some time, waiting for final  
TR> delivery.  It's certainly not a delay caused by filtering, and the  
TR> list is not in "censorship mode" beyond what's usual - i.e.,  
TR> filtering out postings from non-subscribers, and applying list  
TR> monitor decisions.

TR> (Note that "filtering out" more precisely means that the secretariat 
TR> gets these particular messages for approval - the rest is passed  
TR> through directly.  See majordomo's documentation for more details on 
TR> this.)

>>More particularly, I would like to know exactly how an extraneous 
>>">" was in the post which was published to this list, but not in 
>>the post which was sent.

TR> I'm sorry, but I don't see that ">".  Where precisely is it?




----
Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA     Internet Concepts, Inc.
donbrown_l@inetconcepts.net         http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55              (972) 788-2364  Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate
----

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html