Re: [ga] Names Policy Development Process

[William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>]

Your answers show only that you have NO understanding of how the DNS
works, or why it works that way, Todd.

Go read some articles that explain HOW the dns works, and its
heirarchal structure, and then go back and answer my questions.

Until then, this is just more uninformed suggestions from an
uninformed source.


Monday, July 29, 2002, 9:00:10 AM, todd glassey wrote:

> William -

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "William X Walsh" <william@wxsoft.info>
> To: "todd glassey" <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net>
> Cc: "Ga" <ga@dnso.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 12:09 AM
> Subject: Re: [ga] Names Policy Development Process


>> Sunday, July 28, 2002, 8:42:10 PM, todd glassey wrote:
>>
>> > My feeling is that a Root Zone Protocol as a top layer of a DNS
> resolution
>> > model might be also functional. The idea would be that if there was a
> Root
>> > Zone specified in the URI/URL then it would be used otherwise the
> default
>> > set would be (i.e. the ICANN set).
>>
>> > The real win as I have said would be properly outfitted search engines
> since
>> > these are really the next generation resolution services anyway.
>>
>> All your proposal does is essentially create a network of third level
>> domain registries, and solves none of the problems.

> Sorry - this is simply not true. My RZP allows for multiple root domains to
> exist together in any number of models. These clearly are not Domain
> Registries but rather a simple LDAP infrastructure listing which sets of
> Registries are attached to which sets of  domains. And it does solve the
> Domain Collission and IP issues without any major hurdles. Thats why this
> would actually work - becuase it does not do as you claim, create a third
> tier of registries.

>> Who then gets to
>> decide what "roots" (which are really TLDs, and TLDs become second
>> level domains)


> WRONG - no William, the root zones are not new TLD's in and of
> themselves, they are collections of TLD's that are resolved by any
> specific stated number of servers that make up that ROOT's top-level
> of DNS servers.

>> get into the master dns?

> What are you referring to, in the ICANN Root? (dot ARPA), if that's the case
> then ICANN would, just like it does now. As to the China Root, the Chinese
> government likely would, one would think.

>>
>> Or do you not understand how the hierarchy in the dns works, and why
>> it works that way?

> William - I am tired of your verbal harassment to justify your position. Not
> only is it wrong but its par for the course for you - that's what you do-
> you verbally abuse people and the records speak for themselves. Look at the
> archives over the past few years and what's there - your unhealthy slamming
> of everything that offers anything that is different from your opinion. So
> that means you must be the only right person here - eh...

> Todd Glassey

>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
>> --
>> Save Internet Radio!
>> CARP will kill Webcasting!
>> http://www.saveinternetradio.org/
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>>


> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html





-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--
Save Internet Radio!  
CARP will kill Webcasting!
http://www.saveinternetradio.org/


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html