RE: [ga] RE: "The reform committee continues to refine its proposals..."

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

Karl, I appreciate your post, but I do question your comment about the DNSO NC. 
Posting questions isn't the only way to take input/exchange information. dialogue can occur in 
one to one conversations, in the NC itself, and within constituencies.

Let's not judge how others process information by what "we" need for ourselves.
:-)



-----Original Message-----
From: Karl Auerbach [mailto:karl@CaveBear.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2002 5:46 PM
To: Roberto Gaetano
Cc: ga@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [ga] RE: "The reform committee continues to refine its
proposals..."


On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, Roberto Gaetano wrote:

(I've pruned the cc-list.)


> ... I would be please by a post from every 
> Director stating that he/she did read the postings on public fora on the 
> subjects on which the Board had to take a decision.

I try to read as much as I physically can, but it is impossible to read, 
much less comprehend, all of it.

Given the ambiguities of human languages it is impossible to say that I
always "understand" what has been said - I often have to ask follow-up
questions.  To my mind it is the absence of these clarifying questions
from other ICANN BoD members and functionaries (including the DNSO NC)
that indicates that ICANN is, for the most part, not really listening.

And as a board member, I can attest that the news that is fed to the board 
by ICANN's management is highly filtered and pre-digested.

Now, one could excuse this if board members were willing to obtain 
information themselves.

		--karl--


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html