Re: [ga] Where are all the reports?

[k@widgital.com (Kristy McKee)]

Vittorio, Thank you for your prompt response,

Are writing this:  Yes, Kristy, we have flushed the entire At Large 
Membership after spending (hundreds?) (thousands?) (millions?) developing it.

??

I don't much care why, I think that's pretty obvious, especially now that 
our rep, Karl Auerbach, has won our court case.

I just want to understand whether or not I need to look into a new org or 
not now; however, if none of the orgs are voting for good representation, I 
am sure it is not worth the time to motivate folks again now that their 
efforts have been trashed by ICANN.

What you think?

~k

At 03:43 PM 8/21/2002 +0200, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
>On Tue, 20 Aug 2002 10:44:11 -0500, you wrote:
>
> >What is the difference between this At Large and the one where hundreds of
> >thousands of people attempted to signed up to vote for Karl Auerbach?
> >
> >Will those of us who voted for representation be permitted in the new At
> >Large?  I noticed no-one in our office or the offices we support have
> >received any information about elections or progress within ICANN's At 
> Large.
> >
> >Are these separate or the same thing with all the members removed?
>
>In fact the Regional At Large Organizations, while allowing into themselves
>all those organizations which want to participate in the process, should
>allow individual registration. Of course, while in the original At Large
>people would vote for nine Board seats, here each Regional membership elects
>two seats in the ALAC, which in turn will elect only one (possibly non
>voting) Board member: so the degree of power the At Large mechanism actually
>handles is much, much lower. But still this scheme should allow the Regional
>orgs, for example, to set up online elections if they desire to do so - and
>I really think they should do it.
>
>A point we wanted to make, however, is that neither we nor ICANN should
>enter so deeply into the internal processes of such At Large Organizations.
>ICANN should pose some requirements in terms of openness and sustainability,
>for example; but how these Organizations work and choose their
>representatives should be independently determined by themselves.
>--
>vb.               [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<------
>--------> http://bertola.eu.org/ - Archivio FAQ e molto altro... <--------
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html