Re: [ga] Re: Violations of the Bylaws?

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Vinton and all assembly members,

  You "Believe"??!!  Hummm, seems to me you either know or you
don't know Vint.   I would say given this expected spin sort of response,
that you don't know if the bylaws were violated or not...

vinton g. cerf wrote:

> Danny,
>
> I believe the board is operating within the ICANN Bylaws. If you think
> otherwise, then you are free to submit a reconsideration request outlining
> the specifics that you believe constitute a deviation from them.
>
> Vint
>
> At 12:08 PM 8/24/2002 -0400, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
> >Dear Vint,
> >
> >Before I proceed to file a reconsideration request, I would appreciate an
> >answer to the following questions:
> >
> >1.  Our bylaws state:  "The Board shall post on the Web Site (i) periodically
> >a calendar of scheduled meetings for the upcoming year, and (ii) in advance
> >of each Board meeting, a notice of the fact and time that such meeting will
> >be held and, to the extent known, an agenda for the meeting. If reasonably
> >practicable, the Board shall post notices of special meetings of the Board at
> >least fourteen (14) days prior to the meetings."  The notice of the special
> >meeting of the Board was not posted 14 days in advance of such meeting -- Why?
> >
> >2.  Our bylaws state:  "If the Board declines to accept any recommendation of
> >a Supporting Organization, it shall return the recommendation to the
> >Supporting Organization for further consideration, along with a statement of
> >the reasons it declines to accept the recommendation.  If, after reasonable
> >efforts, the Board does not receive a recommendation from the Supporting
> >Organization that it finds meets the standards of Section 2(e) of this
> >Article VI or, after attempting to mediate any disputes or disagreements
> >between Supporting Organizations, receives conflicting recommendations from
> >Supporting Organizations, and the Board finds there is a justification for
> >prompt action, the Board may initiate, amend or modify and then approve a
> >specific policy recommendation."   With respect to WLS, the Board declined to
> >accept the recommendation of the DNSO yet failed to return the recommendation
> >to the DNSO for further consideration -- Why?
> >
> >I do not seek to challenge the Board's decision with regard to WLS, only the
> >Board's conduct with respect to the Bylaws.  Can you offer a rational
> >justification for the Board's violation of these bylaws?
>
> Vint Cerf
> SVP Architecture & Technology
> WorldCom
> 22001 Loudoun County Parkway, F2-4115
> Ashburn, VA 20147
> 703 886 1690 (v806 1690)
> 703 886 0047 fax
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 127k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 972-244-3801
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html