<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Re: The Arabic Internet Names Consortium (AINC)
- To: "Asaad Y. Alnajjar ( Millennium Inc.)" <alnajjar@any-dns.com>
- Subject: [ga] Re: The Arabic Internet Names Consortium (AINC)
- From: Joe Baptista <baptista@dot-god.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:42:24 -0500 (EST)
- cc: Jim Fleming <JimFleming@ameritech.net>, <yjpark@myepark.com>, <steinle@smartvia.de>, "Richard J. Sexton" <richard@vrx.net>, Richard Henderson <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>, <ray@fassett.org>, <love@cptech.org>, <karl@CaveBear.com>, <k@widgital.com>, Judith Oppenheimer <joppenheimer@icbtollfree.com>, Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>, Joanna Lane <jo-uk@rcn.com>, <jefsey@jefsey.com>, <eric@hi-tek.com>, Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>, Bruce Young <Bruce@barelyadequate.info>, <andy@ccc.de>, "@quasar Internet Solutions, Inc." <shore@quasar.net>, <espresso@e-scape.net>, General Assembly of the DNSO <ga@dnso.org>
- In-Reply-To: <jUsT.aNoTheR.mEsSaGe.iD.103642957315757@any-dns.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Asaad Y. Alnajjar ( Millennium Inc.) wrote:
> So far the technology providers has submitted to AINC proposals for:
> .com, .net, .org, .info, .name and the last is the equivalent of
> .media. In addition we have rec'd some proposals for Arabic Keywords
> solutions (different from Realnames concept) to be reviewed and evaluated.
Do you have links for these proposals published anywhere?
I'm not sure what you mean by proposals to the .com universe.
> Personally, I forsee and have encouraged the gradual adoption of all
> other gTLDs once a clear defined path is defined and an Arabic
> Standard of equivalence is adopted.
why don't you setup your own arabic tlds. if australian aboriginies can
do it i'm sure you can too.
> Besides, it is the customers & end users that will be the final judge
> of what works and what don't.
I also would suggest you educate them. The recent root server attacks
should be investigated and your various arabic governments rely on us root
server technology to guide them along. This is a definate invitation to
potential damage to arabic computer operations - which see:
http://www.dot-god.com/bod/jb/Root_Server_Privacy_Complaint.pdf
and considering here is active monitoring of root operations these days
http://www.caida.org/projects/dns-analysis/
I would think there's some cause for concern to arab government and
business.
regards
joe baptista
>
> Regards,
>
> Asaad Alnajjar
> CEO Millennium Inc.
>
>
>
>
> At Monday, 4 November 2002, "Jim Fleming" <JimFleming@ameritech.net>
> wrote:
>
> >Besides .COM and .NET, what other 8 TLDs do you think should be
> considered
> >the Best-of-Breed ?
> >
> >http://www.arabicdomainname.org/ainc-bod.htm
> >
> >
> >==========================================
> >
> >Jim Fleming
> >128-bit DNS is closer than you think...
> >http://ipv8.dyndns.tv
> >http://ipv8.dyns.cx
> >http://ipv8.no-ip.com
> >http://ipv8.no-ip.biz
> >http://ipv8.no-ip.info
> >http://ipv8.myip.us
> >http://ipv8.dyn.ee
> >http://ipv8.community.net.au
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|