<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Re: The Arabic Internet Names Consortium (AINC)
- To: Joe Baptista <baptista@dot-god.com>
- Subject: [ga] Re: The Arabic Internet Names Consortium (AINC)
- From: eric@hi-tek.com
- Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 11:07:19 -0800
- CC: "Asaad Y. Alnajjar ( Millennium Inc.)" <alnajjar@any-dns.com>, Jim Fleming <JimFleming@ameritech.net>, yjpark@myepark.com, steinle@smartvia.de, "Richard J. Sexton" <richard@vrx.net>, Richard Henderson <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>, ray@fassett.org, love@cptech.org, karl@CaveBear.com, k@widgital.com, Judith Oppenheimer <joppenheimer@icbtollfree.com>, Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>, Joanna Lane <jo-uk@rcn.com>, jefsey@jefsey.com, Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>, Bruce Young <Bruce@barelyadequate.info>, andy@ccc.de, "@quasar Internet Solutions, Inc." <shore@quasar.net>, espresso@e-scape.net, General Assembly of the DNSO <ga@dnso.org>
- Organization: Hi-Tek.com.vn
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0211041304210.9728-100000@dot-god.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org
clearly the necessity for divergence and independence of communication and the
back bone that supports that communication should be paramount in our
thoughts.
I think that US interests are best served by incorporation of varying cultures
and regions self developing their own communications and freedom of thought.
In knowledge there is a base for freedom, without it there is no chance. And
freedom is after all what we stand for - no?
but should they go down the root server path? me thinks not.
e
Joe Baptista wrote:
> Well my main concern would be that the arabic world free itself from
> reliance on the USG root server infrastructure and start their own - which
> would provide arabic governments with some satisfaction that it has
> integrety - i.e. not under us government control - which my letter to the
> privacy and information commissioners of canada makes clear.
>
> Cheers
> Joe Baptista
>
> --
> Planet Communications & Computing Facility
> a division of The dot.GOD Registry, Limited
>
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Asaad Y. Alnajjar ( Millennium Inc.) wrote:
>
> > Joe,
> >
> > There is lots of information and a powerpoint presentaion on our
> > site www.ArabicDomainName.org that I hope would be helpful for you.
> >
> >
> > Most of our updated materials can be found from our Tunisia APril
> > 2002 meeting at ftp://www.any-dns.com/
> >
> > So far what we have is what the technology providers recommends and
> > we work with them for the best fit solution for the Arabic Language.
> > Now, for consumer education we do give seminars and circulations
> > to get that going through different channels.
> >
> > As always we are open to suggestions and recommendation and would
> > like to get more input from you to address your concerns for Arabic
> > and other languages. It is a learning journey for all of us after
> > all.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Asaad Alnajjar
> > CEO Millennium Inc.
> >
> >
> >
> > At Monday, 4 November 2002, Joe Baptista <baptista@dot-god.com> wrote:
> >
> > >On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Asaad Y. Alnajjar ( Millennium Inc.) wrote:
> > >
> > >> So far the technology providers has submitted to AINC proposals for:
> > >> .com, .net, .org, .info, .name and the last is the equivalent of
> > >> .media. In addition we have rec'd some proposals for Arabic Keywords
> > >> solutions (different from Realnames concept) to be reviewed and
> > evaluated.
> > >
> > >Do you have links for these proposals published anywhere?
> > >
> > >I'm not sure what you mean by proposals to the .com universe.
> > >
> > >> Personally, I forsee and have encouraged the gradual adoption of all
> > >> other gTLDs once a clear defined path is defined and an Arabic
> > >> Standard of equivalence is adopted.
> > >
> > >why don't you setup your own arabic tlds. if australian aboriginies
> > can
> > >do it i'm sure you can too.
> > >
> > >> Besides, it is the customers & end users that will be the final judge
> > >> of what works and what don't.
> > >
> > >I also would suggest you educate them. The recent root server attacks
> > >should be investigated and your various arabic governments rely
> > on us root
> > >server technology to guide them along. This is a definate invitation
> > to
> > >potential damage to arabic computer operations - which see:
> > >
> > >http://www.dot-god.com/bod/jb/Root_Server_Privacy_Complaint.pdf
> > >
> > >and considering here is active monitoring of root operations these days
> > >
> > >http://www.caida.org/projects/dns-analysis/
> > >
> > >I would think there's some cause for concern to arab government and
> > >business.
> > >
> > >regards
> > >joe baptista
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >> Asaad Alnajjar
> > >> CEO Millennium Inc.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> At Monday, 4 November 2002, "Jim Fleming" <JimFleming@ameritech.net>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >Besides .COM and .NET, what other 8 TLDs do you think should be
> > >> considered
> > >> >the Best-of-Breed ?
> > >> >
> > >> >http://www.arabicdomainname.org/ainc-bod.htm
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >==========================================
> > >> >
> > >> >Jim Fleming
> > >> >128-bit DNS is closer than you think...
> > >> >http://ipv8.dyndns.tv
> > >> >http://ipv8.dyns.cx
> > >> >http://ipv8.no-ip.com
> > >> >http://ipv8.no-ip.biz
> > >> >http://ipv8.no-ip.info
> > >> >http://ipv8.myip.us
> > >> >http://ipv8.dyn.ee
> > >> >http://ipv8.community.net.au
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|