ICANN/GNSO
DNSO and GNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] FW: Comment from the gTLD Registry Constituency


On Monday 30 September 2002 01:03 pm, Elisabeth Porteneuve wrote:
> > Moreover, to the extent that a ccTLD is restricted to a narrow
> > geographical region (e.g., country), I am not suggesting that such a
> > ccTLD would benefit from the same constituency structure as in the
> > current DNSO.  But as you well know, a lot of ccTLD registries are not
> > restricted to their own geographical region; they function essentially
> > like gTLD registries on a global basis.  In those cases, I see little
> > difference between ccTLDs and gTLDs because users expand beyond local
> > boarders and associated policy issues are the pretty much the same.
> >
> >
> > Chuck

Not entirely true, Chuck.  ccTLDs that use registrars and providers other than 
those in their own region still operate under the laws of that 
region/country.  Simply because they have expanded their "sales" is not 
reason enough to treat them as gTLDs governed by ICANN.  

Leah 

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>