Re: [ga] ITU Resolution 102 -- four years later

[Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>]

>Take another read of 102 and in each case where it says "private industry"
>or "private sector" insert "Local Telco Monopoly". Where it says
>"appropriate interests" or "appropriate entities" or similar insert "Local
>Telco Monopoly" or "Well-connected Telco Industry Player" and where it says
>"management" simply insert "regulation".
>
>Someone please tell me that I'm wrong - I really don't want to be "right" on
>this one.

Sorry, but you're BANG ON.

The one thing we DO NOT want to replace ICANN with is the ITU. God help us.

-- 
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.tldlobby.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html