DNSO and GNSO Archives: [ga]

ICANN/GNSO DNSO and GNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] ITU Resolution 102 -- four years later

To: Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>
Subject: Re: [ga] ITU Resolution 102 -- four years later
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:27:38 +0200
Cc: ga@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <a05111714b9d3d7ba4725@[172.20.3.27]>
Organization: NIC France
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20021016141633.0165df90@pop.puretec.de> <035701c2753c$c5c2a2f0$f80b000a@rraderxp> <a05111714b9d3d7ba4725@[172.20.3.27]>
Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:59:22PM -0500,
 Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz> wrote 
 a message of 23 lines which said:

> The one thing we DO NOT want to replace ICANN with is the ITU. God help us.

I could certainly agree (replacing a US-only bureaucracy by an
international monster which tried very hard to crush the Internet is a
progress?) but you did not explain *why*.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ga] ITU Resolution 102 -- four years later
  - From: Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>

References:
- [ga] ITU Resolution 102 -- four years later
  - From: Alexander Svensson <alexander@svensson.de>
- Re: [ga] ITU Resolution 102 -- four years later
  - From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
- Re: [ga] ITU Resolution 102 -- four years later
  - From: Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>
- Re: [ga] ITU Resolution 102 -- four years later
  - From: Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>