Re: [ga] FYI: Final Implementation Report and proposed new Bylaws

["J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@club-internet.fr>]

On 09:26 03/10/02, Peter Dengate Thrush said:
> > ARTICLE XVII: MEMBERS
> > ICANN shall not have members, as defined in the California Nonprofit
> > Public Benefit Corporation Law ("CNPBCL"), notwithstanding the use of the
> > term "Member" in these Bylaws, in any ICANN document, or in any action of
> > the ICANN Board or staff.
> > and there goes the baby with the bath water....
>These have been missing for some time....
>and no calls in the reform debate for their re-instatement..?

the Members as for any Agency are the people represented by the Congress 
delegating to the proper Department(s). I do not see any foreigner having a 
share in decisions of any State Agency anywhere in th woerld. Let remember 
us how many non-US citizens in the ICANN executive body (Staff)?
jfc