<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] BULK whois
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 09:49:45AM -0500, John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D. wrote:
[...]
> So we have the regular spectacle of contributors such as Mr. Crispin, who
> make the point that ICANN is not a consumer protection agency,
Which is undeniably true...
> but entirely
> miss the point that the relevant contracts bearing on registrar procedures
> are contracts with ICANN. Mr. Crispin's point boils down to "if registrars
> breach their contract with ICANN, it is not ICANN's job to care. *You* can't
> require ICANN to care if the contracts are not followed". Ha, ha, the joke
> is on you for believing these contracts mean anything.
Sorry, my point does not "boil down" to the above wild extrapolation.
Please, don't try to "boil down" my points, since you clearly have no
interest in them. :-)
[ rant deleted ]
Kent
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|