<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] WHOIS data on .org domains
On 2003-02-14 11:07:54 -0500, Ram Mohan wrote:
> xWhois is on PIR's list of possible new services. So is
> OrgCloak. Neither have prices or plans announced - you should
> ask PIR for specifics. So before you make a claim about
> legality, might be worthwhile checking what is mandatory (Whois)
> and what is not (xWhois, OrgCloak, and a host of other potential,
> optional services). I'm not a lawyer myself, but it seems very
> clear that you're linking two entirely different things
> (mandatory services vs. optional services).
What, precisely, is "optional" about the following language?
| 8. Extended Whois (xWhois)
|
| Registry Operator will use its best commercial efforts to develop
| and implement an extended Whois (xWhois) service. This
| subscription-based service is intended to provide:
|
| An interface to the Whois database that will permit interested third
| parties to conduct enhanced Whois searches using Boolean and
| character string technologies.
...
(From Appendix O of the .org Registry Agreement.)
--
Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|