Re: The telephone network and the internet (RE: [ga] ALAC comments on proposed Bylaws modifications)

[Vittorio Bertola <vb@bertola.eu.org>]

On Sun, 09 Mar 2003 11:38:24 +0100, you wrote:

>The current ICANN drift (cf. Vittorio's use in ITU document) towards 
>"national digital sovereignty" is extremely clever. Let compare:
>
>- State digital sovereignty. (...)
>
>- national digital sovereignty. This is a confuse concept (except when 
>speaking of the USA at large as a sovereign nation over the other nations - 
>one has to be a sovereign over something).

Are you sure you actually read my paper? By "national digital
sovereignty" I was meaning the exact opposite of what you have just
said, and there's no way you could misunderstand this by reading the
paper. Also, please point out where ICANN has supported my statement,
before calling it an "ICANN drift". In fact, my paper had a good and
explicit amount of criticism for ICANN too.
-- 
vb.                  [Vittorio Bertola - vb [at] bertola.eu.org]<---
-------------------> http://bertola.eu.org/ <-----------------------
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html