[ga] Which TLD corresponds to Mexico ?

["Jim Fleming" <JimFleming@ameritech.net>]

Which TLD corresponds to Mexico ?
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/annualrpt/2002/cy2002annualreport.htm
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
1:34 MEXICO
1:37 NEW-MEXICO
1:43 MEXICO-CITY
1:198     MX   (MEXICO)
1:255     MEX  (MEXICO)
========================

Does Mexico (New or Old) have a contract with the U.S. Government for a TLD ?

Does Mexico have a license to use IPv16 technology ?

Are all of the oil wells in Mexico, now the property of the U.S. Government or the Sovereign Nation of Texico ?
http://www.texico.com/texicomap.html

Is this confusing ?
banxico.org
banxico.org.mx


----- Original Message -----
From: "Rodrigo Orenday Serrato" <rorenday@banxico.org.mx>
To: "'Eric Dierker'" <eric@hi-tek.com>; <jefsey@club-internet.fr>
Cc: <steinle@smartvia.de>; <baptista@dot-god.com>; <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 2:12 PM
Subject: RE: [ga] New TLD White Paper released


> What about the right of a nation over the ccTLD that corresponds to it
> (provided that the ccTLD in question in fact corresponds to a nation-state).
>
> As Prfr. Froomkin put it in one of his papers (please note that this is not
> an exact quote), sovereign nations may come to hold the position that
> control over the ccTLD assigned to them is an "appurtenance" of their
> sovereignty. Spain and Colombia have, for example.
>
> I do beleive that the right of sovereign nations, and other subjects of
> public international law, to control their ccTLD should be acknowledged.
>
>
> Atentamente, Regards
> Rodrigo Orenday Serratos
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]En nombre de Eric
> Dierker
> Enviado el: Sábado, 22 de Marzo de 2003 06:24 PM
> Para: jefsey@club-internet.fr
> CC: steinle@smartvia.de; baptista@dot-god.com; ga@dnso.org
> Asunto: Re: [ga] New TLD White Paper released
>
>
> I can show you!  Try,  it.com.vn
> I do not buy into the TLD garbage but I buy into ccTLD market.
> We must back it up with secondary market contributers.
> e
> > At 04:08 20/03/03, steinle@smartvia.de wrote:
> >>Please show me only one case where your sole rights in a TLD was
> >>acknowledged.
> >
> > No one has right in an TLD, as no one as right into a nation.
> > Exept to some extend its registrants.
> >
> > That ICANN has accepted an absurd economical model
> > where people buy their own name or lose them, does not
> > change anything to this.
> >
> > Please eread RFC 920 and 1591.
> > jfc
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html