Re: [ga] Dotster's latest letter to ICANN re: WLS -- Why hasn't ICANNacknowledged it?

[Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

George et al.,

But the WLS has already been implemented...

Sotiris Sotiropoulos

George Kirikos wrote:

>Hello,
>
>Dotster has posted their latest letter to ICANN, dated April 9, 2003,
>on their website at:
>
>http://www.dotster.com/common/content/wls/index.php
>http://www.dotster.com/common/content/wls/wlsltr.pdf
>
>I notice that this important correspondence has not been posted at:
>
>http://www.icann.org/correspondence/
>
>nor has ICANN's response, if any. Please have your webmasters update
>the page.
>
>Dotster and the consensus majority of other market participants (as
>shown in the Name Council's consensus rejection of the WLS proposal)
>have grave concerns over WLS, and its impact on consumer choice,
>registrar innovation and competition. Dotster's Independent Review
>Request and Reconsideration Requests, dated September 2002, have
>received no response, even though they have a contractual relationship
>with ICANN. It would be common courtesy for ICANN to have made some
>response. Good faith would require it, especially in an open and
>transparent ICANN.
>
>Thus, I'd like to reiterate their concerns, as they speak for many who
>have been watching this issue closely:
>
>1. Why hasn't ICANN taken action nor responded to the aforementioned
>requests?
>2. By what date will action be taken on those requests?
>
>Also, please clarify for all market participants that WLS will NOT be
>introduced on July 25, 2003, or any future date, until objecting
>parties have exhausted their avenues of appeal for this issue (the
>first avenue being the above Requests, i.e. the answer to question #2
>above). 
>
>I would also request that the community have at least a 3-month notice
>period of any planned Implementation Date for WLS, so that it can make
>the appropriate technical adjustments and responses in an orderly
>fashion.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>George Kirikos
>http://www.kirikos.com/
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>  
>


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html