[ga] "constituency" and "GNSO"

["Jim Fleming" <JimFleming@ameritech.net>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sotiris Sotiropoulos" <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>
To: "Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>
> Who can still say that domain name registrants do not need a 
> Constituency of their own in the GNSO?
====================================

With all due respect, when you use terms like "constituency" and "GNSO" you are buying into a structure
that is pre-determined to be biased **against** the "domain name registrants".
That just helps to perpetuate "the Big Lie Society", which un-educated netizens have no idea they are endorsing.

Why would that be good for domain name registrants ?

Jim Fleming
http://www.DOT-BIZ.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html