[ga] Re: "constituency" and "GNSO"

[Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

Jim Fleming wrote:

>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Sotiris Sotiropoulos" <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>
>To: "Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>
>  
>
>>Who can still say that domain name registrants do not need a 
>>Constituency of their own in the GNSO?
>>    
>>
>====================================
>
>With all due respect, when you use terms like "constituency" and "GNSO" you are buying into a structure
>that is pre-determined to be biased **against** the "domain name registrants".
>

I don't believe in a determinist world.  I believe we live in the world 
we make.

>That just helps to perpetuate "the Big Lie Society", which un-educated netizens have no idea they are endorsing.
>

The more who take notice, the more that will inevitably be led to your 
conclusions if things are as you say.  Would you have a problem with that?


>
>Why would that be good for domain name registrants ?
>

More of them might come forward and get to know each other.  I think 
getting to know people is a good thing.  Especially when common 
interests are involved.  Don't you?

--Sotiris Sotiropoulos





--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html