Re: [ga] UDRP issues report

[Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>]

AS is well known, the UDRP review was sabotaged by its chair.  There is 
no report, nor was there any attempt to draft one.  All serious 
suggestions for reforms, or even processes that might produce one, were 
opposed by the chair.

DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

>Dear Bruce,
>
>>From the minutes of the April 17, 2003 GNSO teleconference:
>
>Marilyn Cade proposed, seconded by Laurence Djolakian
>
>·         To thank the current UDRP task force for the work done
>
>·         To close down the current UDRP task force that was created under
>the Names Council
>
>·         To initiate the policy development process
>
>·         To seek an issues report from the ICANN Staff Manager and that one
>of the inputs to the issues report is the existing material and analysis
>from the current UDRP task force.
>
>·         That the issues report be done in a 45 day period
>
>Motion carried unanimously.
>http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc12/msg00250.html
>
>It's already one month past the "45 day period", and I don't think that I 
>have seen the UDRP issues report.  Has it been posted?  Has the policy 
>development process been initiated?
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
>
>  
>


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html