RE: [ga] UDRP issues report

["L. Gallegos" <jandl@jandl.com>]

Since when is a bylaws requirement put on the back burner for an RFP or other 
business?  If a deadline is not met in most corporations, what ususally occurs with 
staff?  And how are priorities set for ICANN staff?  Does the Board direct them or 
they the board?  The UDRP must be handled prior to any further work on new 
gTLDs of any kind and is a work in progress.  I find it extrememly difficult to fathom 
the workings of ICANN management or mismanagement.

Leah


On 3 Jul 2003 at 14:49, Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP wrote:

> Just a point of more detailed clarification: the issue was on Council
> agenda; staff advised council that due to other commitments, etc. that the
> Issues Report had not yet been completed. 
> 
> And, given the high number of other items to be dealt with, and the very
> significant progress made with the ccTLDs in the achievement of mutually
> acceptable agreements which now lead to the creation of a ccNSO, as well as
> related work on the bylaws; the RFP for the new gTLDs, it is understandable
> that this issue report was not possible to complete.
> 
> I don't have my notes in front of me, but I believe that there was a
> statement about undertaking completing the Issues Report following
> Montreal.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:roessler@does-not-exist.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:46 PM
> To: ga@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [ga] UDRP issues report
> 
> 
> On 2003-07-03 12:07:38 -0400, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
> 
> > It's already one month past the "45 day period", and I don't
> > think that I have seen the UDRP issues report.  Has it been
> > posted?  Has the policy development process been initiated?
> 
> Discussing an issues report on the UDRP (and possibly initiating a
> task force on the topic) was on the GNSO council's agenda for the
> Montreal meeting. However, no issues report had emerged from ICANN
> staff by that time.
> 
> (I haven't seen one since, either.)
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Roessler			      <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
> 



--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html