<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [nc-deletes] two additional issues
Tim Ruiz wrote:
> It may be that there is a general issue of warehousing that is not
> directly germane to the work of this task force.
Let's think about this another way. I generally think of "warehousing" as a
registrar practice in which the registrar deals in a volume of domain names
for its own account. A domain name can come into a registrar's account by
one of three means:
(1) Registrant allows the domain name to lapse (or asks
that it be deleted), but registrar fails to delete
the domain name during grace period and name renews
at registry. Registrar takes name for its own account.
(2) Registrant purchases domain name through fraud and
registrar takes name during remaining term to resell
in order to cut its losses.
(3) Registrar purchases domain name for its own account
ab initio.
As I read our draft recommendation, practice (1) will no longer be possible.
Practices (2) and (3) are not affected in any way. Correct?
-- Bret
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|