Re: [nc-deletes] two additional issues

["Jordyn A. Buchanan" <jordyn@register.com>]

First, that was Tim quoting me, below, so the attribution isn't quite 
right.

With regards to your question, Bret, your reading of the issue matches 
mine.

Jordyn

On Monday, January 27, 2003, at 12:27  PM, Bret Fausett wrote:

> Tim Ruiz wrote:
>> It may be that there is a general issue of warehousing that is not
>> directly germane to the work of this task force.
>
> Let's think about this another way. I generally think of "warehousing" 
> as a
> registrar practice in which the registrar deals in a volume of domain 
> names
> for its own account. A domain name can come into a registrar's account 
> by
> one of three means:
>
>    (1) Registrant allows the domain name to lapse (or asks
>        that it be deleted), but registrar fails to delete
>        the domain name during grace period and name renews
>        at registry. Registrar takes name for its own account.
>
>    (2) Registrant purchases domain name through fraud and
>        registrar takes name during remaining term to resell
>        in order to cut its losses.
>
>    (3) Registrar purchases domain name for its own account
>        ab initio.
>
> As I read our draft recommendation, practice (1) will no longer be 
> possible.
> Practices (2) and (3) are not affected in any way. Correct?
>
>      -- Bret
>